For such reasons, it is preferable to consider the rule of law not as a model of institutional design, but as a value or group of values that could influence such a conception and can therefore be pursued in various ways. Nevertheless, some fairly simple and generalizable institutional ideas stem from the idea that those who judge the legitimacy of the exercise of power should not be the same as those who exercise it. For example, a typical rule of law will institutionalize certain means of protecting legal officials from political or other interference that threatens their independence. As a result, the institutional separation of the judiciary from other branches of government is generally regarded as an important feature of the rule of law. Other measures to ensure equitable access to legal institutions may also be important for the rule of law. In addition, it is widely accepted that a binding written constitution supports the rule of law and has been adopted by most states around the world. Rules help us to learn, to prepare for life in society. As teenagers, we tend to learn that there are rules for beating, stealing, lying, and wasting. As young adults, we are held accountable for these rules by becoming law-abiding citizens. Laws are not supposed to set teaching limits, but are there to be enforced and are punishable by imprisonment and even death if broken. If you`re old enough to face the law (aside from children who kill children), you`ve already learned the process by dealing with different sets of rules. Other authorities may also create rules; For example, the judicial authorities of each State implement rules that apply to judicial proceedings and, in some cases, the penalties for non-compliance can also be very serious.
Equality before the law: Another aspect or characteristic of the rule of law is equality before the law. The rule of law means that any person and authority in a country is subject to the laws of that country. The law should be promulgated and applied to all persons, groups and organs of government. This person has the power and the right to create rules for the institution. Depending on the example, that person is the director or the director or the director. He or she creates „rules” to improve the school. We have three levels of law: god`s laws that cannot be violated without blind consequences (logic, mathematics, physics, light, energy, gravity, movement, morality – murder, immorality, injustice), the laws of a nation that help citizens keep the peace in God`s higher laws, and the rules of people who help us not to break the laws of our nation. Electoral justice is another example of the links between democracy and the rule of law.
Electoral justice shall ensure that every act, procedure and decision related to the electoral process is in accordance with the law and that the enjoyment of the right to vote is protected and restored so that persons who believe that their right to vote has been violated have the opportunity to lodge a complaint, to receive a hearing and to receive a decision. An electoral system is an essential instrument of the rule of law and the ultimate guarantee of respect for the democratic principle of free, fair and genuine elections.6 During the negotiations on the General Assembly Declaration on the Rule of Law, some Member States stressed the need for the international community to assist and support countries that have overcome conflict or are in the process of democratization. at their request, as they may face particular challenges in addressing the legacy of human rights violations during their transition and moving towards democratic governance and the rule of law. The concept was finally reformulated in paragraph 18, referring only to the specific challenges of transitions, without mentioning democratization. However, this debate has shown how important it is to draw on the experience of the past 30 years, especially in the global South, of multiple and often simultaneous transitions – from war to peace, from command to market economies, from autocratic systems to democratic systems – in order to support national democratisation processes. godofgodseyes.blogspot.com/2012/11/rule-law-legal.html What is the difference between a rule and a law? While there are many differences between rules and laws, the most important is the CONSEQUENCE. RULES are a set of instructions that help people live and work together. . LAW is a set of legal rules designed to help maintain order, protect property and ensure the safety of people. The word „rule” has several meanings („meaning”). And the legal meaning of „rule” includes the notion of mandatory compliance with sanctions in case of non-compliance.
Over the years, the United Nations has promoted the rule of law at the international level by consolidating and developing an international framework of norms and standards, establishing international and hybrid tribunals and extrajudicial mechanisms. It has refined its framework for engagement in the rule of law at the national level by providing support for the drafting of the constitution; the national legal framework; justice, governance, security and human rights institutions; transitional justice; and strengthening civil society.4 The Secretary-General`s 2008 Guidance on the United Nations approach to rule of law assistance contained general principles and a framework to guide the United Nations rule of law at the national level. In addition, its 2009 guideline on United Nations support to constitutional education processes outlined the components of constitutional processes and recognized that these processes are a central aspect of democratic transitions. Both are terms that fall within the legal branch of the study. „Rules” and „laws” contribute to the proper functioning of a country. RULE – a set of explicit or understood rules or principles that govern behavior in a particular activity or field. Rule of law – a state of order in which events are in accordance with the law. The difference between rules and laws is the result of their violation.
While breaking a rule can have benign consequences, breaking the law can have serious consequences. And to live in a world that has diversity in every corner, there must be mutual respect and harmony in people. There should be a peaceful and respectful relationship between the people to achieve the level of harmony in the world. Question: What is the difference between the rule of law and the rule of law? Answer: Rule: Rule of an established principle, standard or guide for action. . Rule of law: The rule of law implies that no one is above the law. Definitions of the one-man rule. a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not limited by a constitution, laws or opposition, etc.) synonymous: Caesarism, Stalinism, absolutism, authoritarianism, despotism, dictatorship, monocracy, shogunate, totalitarianism, tyranny. Types: Police state. The rule of law has three meanings. This means first and foremost the absolute supremacy or supremacy of ordinary law as opposed to the influence of arbitrary power.
Second, it means equality before the law, and third, the laws of the Constitution are the consequence of the rights of the individual. The rule of law is an ancient ideal first postulated by Aristotle, a Greek scholar, as a system of rules inherent in the natural order. In England, the rule of law sometimes began around 1215, when King John of England signed the Magna Carta of 1215. The rule of law not only implies such fundamental requirements for the way in which the law should be implemented in society, but also implies certain qualities in relation to the characteristics and content of the laws themselves. In particular, laws must be open and clear, of general form, universally applicable and recognizable to all. In addition, legal requirements must be such that people can be guided by them; They must not impose unreasonable cognitive or behavioural demands on the people they are supposed to follow. Therefore, the law should be relatively stable and include certain requirements that people can consult before acting, and legal obligations should not be set retroactively. In addition, the law should remain internally consistent and, if not, provide legal means to resolve any contradictions that may arise. .